White.Market

White.Market

  • 5% Seller Fee
  • 0% Buyer Fee
  • 1–3% Deposit Fee
  • 1–3% Withdrawal Fee

Introduction

White.Market is a peer-to-peer CS2 marketplace inside the WhiteBIT crypto-exchange ecosystem, and an official partner of NAVI and FACEIT. That heritage shapes the product: it leans heavily on crypto, with a card payout available alongside it, but no bank transfer or PayPal route at all.

How the market works

White.Market positions itself as a Steam Market alternative without bots or trade holds — items list and sell directly between users, and the pitch is that unlike Steam itself, the money you make can actually leave the platform.

Fees explained

A clean split: 5% per skin sold with a $0.01 minimum, and nothing at all on the buyer side. Deposits and withdrawals run through crypto or card, and the two rails are priced differently: crypto, plus WhiteBIT Codes specifically, cost nothing per the FAQ, while card rails carry the 1–3% fee. A separate news post on White.Market’s own site claims 0% deposit and withdrawal fees across all standard methods, which contradicts the FAQ — we treat the FAQ as the canonical source.

How to buy

Buyers pay 0% commission and can fund a purchase with crypto, a credit or debit card, a gift card, or by trading in skins directly. Because listings sell peer-to-peer with no trade hold, a bought item transfers straight from the seller rather than sitting in platform-held inventory first.

How to sell

Selling costs a flat 5% of the sale price, with a $0.01 minimum, taken once the item sells rather than at the point of listing. There are no bots and no trade hold standing between a listing and a completed sale, so the skin moves out of your inventory as soon as a buyer pays.

Cashing out

Crypto or card. Crypto — USDT, BTC, ETH, WBT or WhiteBIT Codes — withdraws fee-free; a credit or debit card withdrawal carries the 1–3% fee described above. There is no bank transfer or PayPal payout of any kind, so anyone who wants their money as cash still needs a card to receive it, since crypto has to land in a wallet first.

Verification

Identity checks are a recurring theme in its negative reviews, which describe verification being demanded shortly after a deposit, and some accounts blocked afterwards. White.Market also replies to only about 45% of its negative reviews, the lowest response rate among the marketplaces we compared.

Company structure

Unusually layered, and disclosed openly in its own terms: WhitemarketDigital OÜ in Estonia handles fiat and EU platform administration, Whitemarket Limited in the British Virgin Islands handles crypto services, and three further Hong Kong entities cover platform administration, technology and B2B.

Who it's for

A good fit for crypto-native traders who want a 0% buyer fee and a straightforward 5% sale. A poor fit for anyone who needs a bank transfer or PayPal payout, or who would rather not navigate a mid-transaction identity check.

Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages

  • 0% buyer fee with a flat, clearly published 5% seller fee
  • WhiteBIT Codes are singled out in the FAQ as a fee-free withdrawal route
  • No bots and no trade hold on listings
  • Corporate structure disclosed in full in its own terms
  • Backed by the WhiteBIT exchange; NAVI and FACEIT partner

Disadvantages

  • No bank transfer or PayPal payout — only crypto (fee-free) or card (1–3%)
  • Card deposits and card withdrawals both cost 1–3%, though crypto and WhiteBIT Codes are free
  • Recurring reports of identity checks demanded after depositing
  • Replies to only around 45% of its negative reviews
  • 19% of its reviews are one-star, the weakest distribution here

Alternatives to White.Market

Frequently Asked Questions

5% per skin sold, with a $0.01 minimum, and no buyer fee at all. Deposits and withdrawals cost between 1% and 3% depending on the payment system; the one exception the FAQ names is WhiteBIT Codes, which carry no fee. A separate White.Market news page claims 0% fees across all standard methods, but that conflicts with the FAQ, which we treat as authoritative.

Last reviewed 17 August 2026.